Legal Opinion

Acuity Mutual Insurance v. Frye

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided March 22, 2010No. 3:09-cv-00157PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

R. ALLAN EDGAR, District Judge.

Defendant Darrell Frye owns a building and his wife, defendant Lafonne Frye, used the building to operate a children’s daycare business known as the Trinity Learning Center. On February 9, 2009, Darrell Frye and Lafonne Frye doing business as the Trinity Learning Center suffered a fire loss. The fire caused substantial damage to the building and the business. Defendants made a claim for fire insurance benefits under Policy L82005 issued by plaintiff Acuity Mutual Insurance Company (“Acuity”). The only named insured on the policy is Darrell…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Carolyn T. Rodgers v. Elizabeth BanksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson & Associates, LLC v. The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
  2. Allstate Insurance Company v. Diana Lynn TarrantCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
  3. Progressive Hawaii Insurance Corp. v. SkibaDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API