Legal Opinion
Naumkeag Theatres Co., Inc. v. New England Theatres, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 25, 1965No. 6352_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Chief Judge.
This is a moving picture private antitrust action in which the primary question is whether the evidence, including any which we may find the district court wrongfully excluded, entitled, or would have entitled, the plaintiff to go to the jury. The district court directed a verdict for the defendants at the close of plaintiff’s case on the ground that no conspiracy had been shown. Plaintiff appeals.
The plaintiff, Naumkeag Theatres Co., Inc., operates the Paramount Theatre in Salem, Massachusetts. Defendant appellees are six national distributors of motion picture films, 1…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Theatre Enterprises, Inc. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Solomon Dehydrating Company, Incorporated v. Clarence R. Guyton, Central Greyhound Lines, Incorporated, and the Greyhound CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Southway Theatres, Inc. v. Georgia Theatre CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Levitch v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Federal Trade Commission, Ethyl Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Northeast Airlines, Inc. v. Nationwide Charters and Conventions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Theee Movies of Tarzana v. Pacific Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.