Legal Opinion

Chicago Stamping Co. v. Bignall

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 18, 1894Published

Memorandum.—Assumpsit on a promissory note. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. John Barton Payne, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

The declaration began thus: “ The Chicago Stamping Company, a corporation, etc., plaintiff, by Charles M. Sturges, its attorney, complains of Solomon L. Bignall, Edmond B. Bigelow, Claude Bigelow and Charles J. Glenn, late copartners in business, under the style and firm name of Chicago Lamp Company,’ defendants, etc., of a plea of trespass on the case on promises. For that, whereas, the said defendants heretofore, to wit: On the fifteenth day of September, in the year of our Lord, one thousand eight hundred and eighty-six, at Chicago, to wit, at the county aforesaid, made their certain note…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Supreme Lodge of Ancient Order of United Workmen v. ZuhlkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Frankland v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Supreme Lodge of Ancient Order of United Workmen v. ZuhlkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889
  4. Frankland v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  5. Karch v. EmerickIllinois Supreme Court · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API