Legal Opinion
State v. McDonald Lumber Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided January 12, 1960PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
An order denying the application of one not a party to an action to be permitted to intervene in the action is an appealable order. Hartwig v. Harvey (1947), 250 Wis. 478, 27 N. W. (2d) 363, 15 A. L. R. (2d) 333. This is because the application to intervene constitutes a special proceeding, and the order denying the same is a final order affecting a substantial right. Sec. 274.33 (2), Stats., specifically makes such an order appealable.
On the other hand, an order denying an application by one who is already a party to an action to implead some third party is not appealable. Stobbe v. Atkinson…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Evans v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- McCarville v. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Hartwig v. HarveyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Jones v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- McElroy v. Minnesota Percheron Horse Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wengerd v. RinehartCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
- Becker v. BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Brody v. LongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Bair v. StaatsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Moynahan v. FritzArizona Supreme Court · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.