Legal Opinion
Jenkins v. Board of Parole
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 5, 2013No. A144545PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.
On judicial review of a final order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the board) postponing his scheduled release date from prison under ORS 144.125(3), petitioner asserts that the order is not supported by substantial evidence and reason. The board contends that the first sentence of ORS 144.335(3), added in 1999, excuses the board from a substantial-reason requirement. We conclude that the board’s reading of the statute runs counter to its text, context, and legislative history. As we did in Castro v. Board of Parole, 232 Or App 75, 220 P3d 772 (2009), we hold that ORS…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Drew v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Stevens v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jenkins v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Grimm v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Jenkins v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 2014