Legal Opinion

Earle v. Pardington

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 7, 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District. Action by Henry M. Earle against Arthur R. Pardington. From a judgment dismissing the complaint, plaintiff appeals.

1Per curiam

Plaintiff and defendant were each owners of an automobile. On May 9, 1908, defendant’s automobile was followed at a considerable distance by that of plaintiff on a Long Island country road. The day was clear. At a certain point there was a rise in the road to meet a bridge, and defendant’s car diminished its speed. Plaintiff’s car followed suit, and blew its horn; but as the crest of the incline was reached defendant’s car suddenly stopped (perhaps from lack of power, perhaps from some other cause), with plaintiff’s car about six feet in its rear. Brakes were applied to plaintiff’s car, but…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ritz v. Cousins Lumber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Yanz v. GradNew York Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API