Johnson v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
The verdict is approved by the trial judge, and we can not say that there is no evidence to support it. In *149Rogers v. State, 101 Ga. 562, 563 (28 S. E. 978), Justice Cobb said: “Applications for new trials on the ground that the verdict of the jury is contrary to evidence are addressed to a sound legal discretion to be exercised by the trial judges. When this discretion has been exercised and the motion for a’ new trial overruled, this court will not interfere where there is any evidence which would justify the jury in reaching the conclusion which it set forth in the verdict. While in many…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Towns v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Fuqua v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Journigan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929