Scott v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
“There was some slight evidence authorizing the verdict; and, the verdict having been approved by the trial judge, under the repeated and uniform rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court a reviewing court is powerless to interfere. When the verdict is apparently decidedly against the weight of the evidence, the trial judge has a wide discretion as to granting or refusing a new trial; but when there is any evidence, however slight, to support a verdict which has been approved by the trial judge, this court is absolutely without authority to control the judgment of the trial court.” Toole…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Toole v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Smith v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924