Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Gardner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1959No. 34736, 34737, 34739PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The charges against appellant, Walter J. Gardner, are: (1) possession of intoxicating Tiquor with intent to sell;. (2) permitting a person.to remain on premises under his control for the purpose of committing acts of prostitution. The charge against appellant, Sherry LaChance, is offering and agreeing to commit an- act of prostitution.

Following conviction in police court (Seattle) on these charges,-they appealed to the superior court. Again com victed, they appeal to this court.-

Seven assignments of error- raise -four issues, none of which has any substantial merit. We will consider them two…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. MasonWashington Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WickeWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. DainardWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State Ex Rel. Derber v. SkaffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API