Walden v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.
The trial court denied appellant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence, imposed in 2006, in which he argued that the trial court failed to orally pronounce various statutorily authorized costs which were included in his -written sentence, making his sentence illegal. We agree with the state that statutory costs and fees, which were not orally imposed, may not be challenged through a rule 3.800(a) motion. We hold a failure to orally pronounce costs imposed on the defendant is not a sentencing error which results in an illegal sentence correctable pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Strickland v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Benner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lindquist v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Durant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- ANTHONY PETERSON v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Angel Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- BOBBY WILKINSON v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.