Legal Opinion

Durant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 9, 2015No. 5D15-451PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSawaya, J.

There are a variety of errors that may occur in the course of sentencing a criminal defendant. The Florida Supreme Court has adopted Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 to provide a mechanism for the correction of sentencing errors. Certain errors, including illegal sentences, may be corrected at any time under rule 3.800(a). The more encompassing rule is rule 3.800(b), which provides time requirements for correction of “any sentencing error.” Nathaniel Durant alleged in a rule 3.800(a) motion filed approximately five years after he was sentenced that the trial court rendered an illegal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  3. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  5. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. ANTHONY PETERSON v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. Andrew Elswick v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
  3. BOBBY WILKINSON v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
  4. Caison v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  5. DAMIAN A. PARKER v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API