Legal Opinion

Mumma v. Reading Company

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 9, 1965No. Civ. A. 29681PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSEPH S. LORD, III, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought this suit under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq.) to recover on two causes of action for two injuries he received, allegedly due to defendant’s negligence, during the course of his employment on January 28, 1961 and January 4, 1964. 1 The jury returned its verdict finding plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence to the extent to 45% and awarding $4,400 net damages for each accident.

Before us now is plaintiff’s timely motion under F.R.Civ.P. 59(e) to modify the judgment on the grounds that there was no…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf R. R. v. McDadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Robert Robinson, Trustee in Bankruptcy of D. C. Sullivan & Co., Inc. v. Watts Detective Agency, Inc., Daniel Sullivan, Billy R. OtteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  2. York Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. Pruitt v. PruittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Stewart v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  5. William Rivera v. Farrell Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API