Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. Santiaguin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
willhite, j.
INTRODUCTION
This is a fraud action brought by an employer against one of its employees. The employer contends the employee has knowingly filed a fraudulent workers’ compensation claim. The employer’s alleged damages are the increased insurance premiums it will be required to pay as a result of the claim. The employee filed a special motion to strike the employer’s complaint under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, the so-called anti-SLAPP statute (strategic lawsuit against public participation). The trial court granted the motion. The employer appeals. We affirm…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zamos v. StroudCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- CHARLES J. VACANTI v. State Comp. Ins. FundCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Service by Medallion, Inc. v. Clorox Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Wilkins v. National Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Mosby v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
3Cited by1 opinion
- Minor v. Fedex Office & Print Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016