Fink v. Stallings 601 Sales, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendant Citicorp contends it is a “purchaser” under G.S. 20-288(e) and thereby entitled to indemnity from North River Insurance Company, the surety on Stallings’ motor vehicle dealer’s bond, for recovery of the $11,245.50 balance due from Stallings on the 1979 Honey motor home.
The statute in question provides in part:
Any purchaser of a motor vehicle who shall have suffered any loss or damage by any act of a motor vehicle dealer that constitutes a violation of this Article shall have the right to institute an action to recover against such motor vehicle dealer and the surety.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lafayette Transportation Service, Inc. v. County of RobesonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Triplett v. JamesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Triplett v. JamesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ferris v. HaymoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Taylor v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Alfred J. Ferris v. Dean Haymore Lucille Inman, Western Surety Company, & Third Party and Carl Edward Simmons, D/B/A Simmons Auto Sales, Individually Clarence B. Inman, "Bill," T/a Inman Motors Myrtle Inman Dorothy M. Simmons, Alfred J. Ferris v. Western Surety Company, & Third Party and Dean Haymore Lucille Inman Carl Edward Simmons, D/B/A Simmons Auto Sales, Individually Clarence B. Inman, "Bill," T/a Inman Motors Myrtle Inman v. Dorothy M. Simmons, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Perkins v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999