MacK v. Augusta-Richmond County, Ga.
District Court, S.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BOWEN, District Judge.
Before the Court in the captioned case is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all of Plaintiffs claims. . Oral argument on the motion was heard on March 10, 2005. Based upon the briefs and argument of counsel, the record evidence, and the relevant law, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff has sued Defendants for terminating him in violation of his First Amendment rights, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and in violation of the federal whistle blower statute, 31 U.S.C. § 3730. Plaintiff also asserts a breach of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Parato v. Unadilla Health Care Center, Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 2011
- Mann v. Heckler & Koch Defense, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
- United States Ex Rel. Vargas v. Lackmann Food Service, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2007