Legal Opinion

Binah Gordon, et al. v. Aetna Life Insurance Company

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided May 15, 2026No. 3:24-cv-01447Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BINAH GORDON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 3:24-cv-1447 (VAB) AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. RULING AND ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS Previously, Dr. Homnick and Dr. Herley (“Plaintiffs”) filed a motion for a preliminary injunction against Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Defendant”) to enjoin the application of Aetna’s Clinical Policy Bulletin 0615 (“CPB 0615”), which excludes gender-affirming facial reconstruction surgeries when used to treat gender dysphoria from insurance coverage. This Court granted the Plaintiffs’ motion for a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. New York State National Organization for Women v. TerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  4. Stephen King v. Allied Vision, Ltd. And Innovation Books, a Division of the Innovation Corporation, New Line Cinema CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. ACC Bondholder Group v. Adelphia Communications Corp. (In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API