Legal Opinion

State v. Fain

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 2010No. Nos. C-080830 and C-080832PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dinkelacker, Judge.

{¶ 1} An application to reopen an appeal must be granted if the applicant establishes “a ‘genuine issue’ as to whether he has a ‘colorable claim’ of ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal.”1 The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Strickland v. Washington2 provides the standard for determining whether the applicant was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel.3 The applicant must prove that “his counsel [performed] deficiently] [in] failing to raise the issues he now presents and that there was a reasonable probability of success had [counsel]…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. BezakOhio Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. Leyh (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. Simpson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. WaltonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State v. LongOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API