Legal Opinion
Markham v. Nisbet
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided July 15, 1952PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
60 So.2d 393 (1952)
MARKHAM
v.
NISBET.
Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division B.
July 15, 1952.
Rehearing Denied September 23, 1952.
Carey & Harrison, St. Petersburg, for appellant.
Grazier & Fielding, St. Petersburg, for appellee.
ROBERTS, Justice.
Appellee filed suit in the court below to collect on a judgment entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, State of Ohio, against appellant. The judgment was based on a promissory note dated April 18, 1928, payable one year after date, and containing a "warrant of attorney" authorizing any attorney at law to confess judgment on the note…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Chicago Life Insurance v. CherrySupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Herron v. PassailaigueSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Sammis v. JamesSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
- Solazo v. BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pacific Mills v. Hillman GarmentSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Jackson v. STELCO EMPLOYEES'CREDIT UNION LIMITEDDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Pearson v. FriedmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- Henry Bierce Co. v. HuntDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Weil v. Chasan, Leyner, Holland & TarrantDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981