State v. Camera Warehouse, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph Jiudice, J.
The petitioner moves for relief pursuant to Executive Law § 63 (12) and General Business Law § 513.
The respondent, a New York corporation operating a mail order business selling photographic equipment, has charged its customers a surcharge when they elected to use a credit card to pay for their orders. Apparently, the majority of the respondent’s customers were residents of States other than New York.
There are two issues raised by the respondent challenging the State’s petition. Firstly, the respondent argues that General Business Law § 518 only outlaws…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rio Grande Oil Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Brown v. Market Development, Inc., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1974
- Kugler v. Haitian Tours, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
3Cited by7 opinions
- New York v. FeldmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- New York Ex Rel. Abrams v. DeFelice (In Re DeFelice)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1987
- People v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. LipsitzNew York Supreme Court · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Miller v. New Womyn, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.