Legal Opinion

Mann v. Adventure Quest, Inc.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 24, 2009No. 2007-443PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

¶ 1. Plaintiffs Scott Mann and the Estate of Nathan LaBrecque appeal from the Windsor Superior Court’s grant of summary judgment to intervenor-insurer Virginia Surety Company, determining that insurer would not owe indemnification to Adventure Quest should it be found liable to plaintiffs for sexual abuse they experienced while attending Adventure Quest’s school. On appeal, plaintiffs argue that insurer was not entitled to summary judgment because the superior court should not have imputed knowledge of the sexual abuse to Adventure Quest and because a material fact remained in dispute. We…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Phoenix Savings and Loan, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  2. First National Bank of Cicero v. Lewco Securities Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  3. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Color Tile, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. Doe v. ForrestSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  5. Nemmers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kenneth P. Felis v. Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC, and Gallagher, Flynn & Company, LLPSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  2. Glassford v. Dufresne & Associates, P.C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  3. Estate of Emil Kuhling by Richard W. Kuhling v. Taylor GlazeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  4. Glassford v. Dufresne & Associates, P.C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  5. Pieciak v. Crowe LLPDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API