Legal Opinion

United States v. Jenkins

United States Customs Court

Decided August 18, 1948No. 7615; Entry Nos. 683-K, etc.; 680-E, etcPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CliNE, Judge:

When these cases were originally before me, I held that the proper basis for reappraisement of the merchandise was foreign value; that the principal market for such merchandise was Vancouver, B. C.; that the manufacturer’s prices to dealers were controlled, but that the dealers freely resold the merchandise to all purchasers in the ordinary course of trade; that their prices established foreign value and that the prices claimed by the plaintiff represented foreign value. United States v. M. V. Jenkins et al., 13 Cust. Ct. 345, Reap. Dec. 6040. This decision was affirmed by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  2. United States v. M. V. JenkinsUnited States Customs Court · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. JenkinsUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  2. United States v. M. V. JenkinsUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  3. United States v. JenkinsUnited States Customs Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API