Legal Opinion
Mathiowetz Construction Co. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 16, 2001No. Civil 01-548 (DWF/AJB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FRANK, District Judge.
Introduction
The above-entitled matter came on for hearing before the undersigned United States District Judge on April 6, 2001, pursuant to Plaintiffs Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs motion is denied.
Background
This action involves the bidding process for a Minnesota Department of Transportation Highway Construction Project, SP No. 0801-0028 (“the Project”), for grading, paving, and related road construction on Highway 4 in Sleepy Eye, Minnesota. The Project was originally let in 2000, but…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Gelco Corp. v. Coniston PartnersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- John MacKey v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. West Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- West Publishing Company v. Mead Data Central, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Keefe-Shea Joint Venture, Inc. v. City of EvanstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Keefe-Shea Joint Venture, Inc. v. City of EvanstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002