Hundhauser v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
Three challenges are made to the judgment of conviction.(1) Defendant himself, in a pro se brief, contends that the complaint and warrant were defective. The court record in this case as to proceedings at the time of arraignment states: “Defendant present in court with attorney. . . . Defendant by his attorney waives any defects in the issuance of the warrant.” Even if there had not been such specific waiver of any defects in the issuance of the warrant, constructive waiver would result from the election by the defendant to enter a plea, demand a jury and proceed to trial. An objection to a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lock v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Oseman v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. CoffeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- People v. TurnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
- Commonwealth v. ROTHLISBERGERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. GriffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Claybrooks v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- First Wisconsin National Bank v. KSW Investments Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Richey v. Neenah Police & Fire CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. GinardiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.