Legal Opinion

City of Scranton v. Fire Fighters Local Union No. 60

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 29, 2010No. 2342 C.D. 2009, 2442 C.D. 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

Table of Contents

I. Introduction. 936

II. Background. 937

A Distressed Status. 937

B. 2002 Recovery Plan. 937

C. Scranton Fire Fighters (2009). 938

1. Generally. 938

2. Terns of 2006 Award. 939

a. Expiration of Recovery Plan. 939

b. Wages. 939

c. Health Care. 939

d. Staffing and Management. 940

e. Other Provisions of Recovery Plan Not Adopted . 941

D. 2008 Award. 942

1. Generally. 942

2. Wages. 942

3. Health Care. 944

4. Fire Fighter Safety. 945

5. Pension Benefits. 946

6. Other Provisions. 947

E. Current Appeals . 947

F. Appeal Granted in Scranton Fire Fighters (2009) . 948

III.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 22Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Borough of Ellwood City v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Chirico v. BD. OF SUP'RS FOR NEWTON TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Wilkinsburg Police Officers Ass'n ex rel. Harder v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. International Ass'n of Fire Fighters, Local 669 v. City of ScrantonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Scranton v. Firefighters Local Union No. 60Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. City of Scranton v. Fire Fighters Local Union No. 60Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. City of Scranton v. Firefighters Local Union No. 60Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API