Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 1, 1993No. 1959PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

Appellant, Ernest Edward Harris, was tried and convicted of driving under the influence. He appeals his conviction. We affirm.

The issues raised in this appeal are whether the trial judge (1) ruled Harris was precluded from cross-examining the breathalyzer operator regarding whether Harris had reasonable opportunity to obtain a blood test, and (2) denied Harris due process of law by instructing the jury that taking the breathalyzer test was a prerequisite to obtaining an independent blood test.

On a Saturday night, May 19, 1990, three narcotics officers sat in an unmarked vehicle…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. RoperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. NewtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. LylesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. KnightonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
  4. State v. BlurtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. KeeseeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API