Legal Opinion

Oklahoma v. Shalala

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 6, 1994No. 93-9572PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

This case involves the applicability of public notice requirements to a state Medicaid plan amendment. Oklahoma petitions for review of a final decision of the Administrator of the Health Care Financing Administration (“HCFA”), an agency within the Department of Health and Human Services, affirming the agency’s disapproval of the effective date of Oklahoma Medicaid state plan amendment 89-18. Petitioner State of Oklahoma argues that HCFA erroneously found (1) that an annual inflation increase in the State’s Medicaid rates to hospitals was a change in methods…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Morabito v. BlumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  4. City of Aurora v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  5. California Ass'n of Bioanalysts v. RankDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Christ the King Manor, Inc. v. Secretary United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  2. S.D. Ex Rel. Dickson v. HoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  3. Independent Acceptance Co. v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Rite Aid of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. HoustounDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. State v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API