Legal Opinion

Atchison v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 3, 1989No. CR 88-154PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s pro se motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 16-90-111 (1987). The trial court treated the appellant’s motion as a petition for post-conviction relief under A.R.Cr.P. Rule 37.1.1 Appellant’s sole argument on appeal is that the trial court’s finding is clearly against the preponderance of the evidence. We disagree and therefore affirm.

Appellant was charged with four counts of burglary, four counts of theft of property, and with being a habitual criminal. Pursuant to a plea agreement,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Huff v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Madewell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Ackers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Parette v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Tornavacca v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  4. KENNETH R. ISOM v. STATE OF ARKANSASSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  5. Norman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API