Legal Opinion

Groves v. Terry

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 13, 1909PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis County Circuit Court. — Eon. Jno. W. McElMnney, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

LAMM, P. J. —

The suit is under section 650 to try and determine title. It was tried on an amended petition which does not describe the real estate claimed by the plaintiffs in common or separately but alleges that the lots owned by them in fee simple are “contained in and are a part of” a certain larger tract, in turn described by metes and bounds, but whether the owners of this larger tract in its entirety are in court we can*596not make out. "Why the aggregation of plaintiffs was joined in the action does not appear. There is no averment they- own any lots as tenants in common. We take it they…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gilchrist v. BryantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. Thompson v. RuddickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Gardner v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hadley v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Flanagan Milling Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. State Ex Rel. Dolman v. Dickey.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  4. Southern Missouri & Arkansas Railroad v. WyattSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  5. Owens v. MathewsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API