Legal Opinion

Ball-Carden Co. v. Ridgell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 4, 1914No. 7157PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Dallas County; Kenneth. Poree, Judge. Action by R. R. Ridgell against George A. Carden and P. D. C. Ball, copartners doing business as the Ball-Carden Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtTalbot, J.

Appellee Ridgell brought this suit against appellants, Ball-Carden Company, a partnership firm composed of George A. Carden and P. D. C. Ball, alleging that appellants had contracted to buy from ap-pellee 26,000 yards of gravel and sand to be used in the construction of locks and dams numbered 2 and 4 on the Trinity river for the United States government, the total consideration for said gravel and sand being $2,600. It is charged that the appellants, after having taken and used $249.59 worth of gravel, had failed to take the balance of the gravel, as contracted for, and judgment was sought…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schoenfeld v. PuyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. McKenzie Const. Co. v. ChanowskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Hines v. WicksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API