Legal Opinion
Schoenfeld v. Puy
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 1, 1933No. 9016PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAY, Justice.
J. De Puy, appellee, instituted this suit in the Seventy-Third district court of Bexar county against Charles M. Sehoenfeld and Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, appellants herein.
De Puy had a contract with the United States government for the construction of a jetty at Sabine Pass. Sehoenfeld entered into a subcontract with De Puy to furnish 44,-000 tons of slope and cap stone, which should weigh not less than 6, nor more than 10, tons per piece. This stone was to be sound, compact, hard, durable stone, satisfactory to the army engineer. The decision of the army…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad v. MarchSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Bradley v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Fullington v. Ozark Poultry Supply Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Kuntz v. SpenceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Highway Department v. MacDougald Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Blue Diamond Motor Bus Co. v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Golden State Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Goodrum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Windowmaster Corporation v. Jefferson Const. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.