Legal Opinion

Lanier v. Eddie Romanelle's

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 19, 2008No. COA07-1154PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from the Opinion and Award of the Industrial Commission entered on 22 June 2007, denying benefits to plaintiff based upon its conclusions that plaintiff sustained neither an injury by accident nor a compensable occupational disease arising out of and in the course of his employment. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm.

I. Background

Plaintiff began his employment with defendant-employer Eddie Romanelle’s 1 in 1996 as a part-time sauté cook. He became a full-time employee in about May 1999, working as kitchen supervisor. In this role, he was responsible for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Holley v. Acts, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Clark v. Wal-MartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dobson v. the Salvation ArmyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. McCoy v. Commercial Metals CompanyNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2010
  3. Rogers v. Prestage FoodsNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2011
  4. Williams v. LAW COMPANIES GROUP, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API