Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1940No. 30787PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

This is an appeal from a verdict and judgment for $1,000 damages for personal injuries to the plaintiff from an assault by one Babcock, an intruder, in the defendant’s depot at Torrington, Wyoming. The negligence charged against the defendant, a common carrier, is in failing to protect the plaintiff, a patron, from such assault.

The defendant for reversal relies upon a number of errors. The defendant insists that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict, and that the court erred in overruling defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of the evidence. The defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Koehn v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Kor v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Standard Distilling & Distributing Co. v. HarrisNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. SteinheilSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  5. Knapp v. Chicago, Kansas & Nebraska RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Angstadt Ex Rel. Angstadt v. ColemanNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Warnemunde v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Leflang v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Lamberth v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Lamberth v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API