Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lamberth v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1945No. 31888Published

1DissentChappell, J.

I do not agree with the majority and briefly state the reasons. As recently as In re Estate of House, 145 Neb. 670, 17 N. W. 2d 883 (in conformity with Sanders v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., 138 Neb. 67, 292 N. W. 35; Bauer & Johnson Co. v. National Roofing Co., 107 Neb. 831, 187 N. W. 59; Standard Distilling & Distributing Co. v. Harris, 75 Neb. 480, 106 N. W. 582; Knight v. Denman, 64 Neb. 814, 90 N. W. 863; and Knapp v. Chicago, K. & N. R. Co., 57 Neb. 195, 77 N. W. 656), this court held: “An instruction which sets out a state of facts, and authorizes a verdict for one of the parties upon a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Knight v. DenmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Bauer & Johnson Co. v. National Roofing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Warnemunde v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Standard Distilling & Distributing Co. v. HarrisNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Knapp v. Chicago, Kansas & Nebraska RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API