Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Trejo

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1972No. 748Published

1DissentSutin, Judge

I dissent. The sodomy statute, § 40A-9-6, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 6), is unconstitutional and void because it regulates private sexual relations between two consenting adults, including husband and wife, both of which adults may be principals. “Force is not an element of the crime.” Washington v. Rodriguez, 82 N.M. 428, 483 P.2d 309 (Ct.App.1971).

The Model Penal Code of the American Law Institute, 1962, § 213.2 suggests a proper sodomy statute. Thus far it has been adopted by the States of Connecticut (Conn.Gen.Stat. § 53a-65 et seq., particularly §§ 53a-75, 53a-76, 53a-77 [1958 Rev. 1969…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Everson v. Board of Ed. of EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. State v. PrinceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Honselman v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API