Legal Opinion

Smithart v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1999No. S-8358PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Charles Smithart appeals his convictions for kidnapping, first-degree sexual assault, and first-degree murder. He argues that the trial court erred by refusing to allow his attorney to present evidence and argument that the crimes were committed by another man. Because the right to present one’s defense is a fundamental right in our criminal justice system, the trial court’s failure to allow Siiiithart to introduce relevant evidence and to argue freely that another man committed the crimes was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. We thus reverse and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Holmes v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. People v. PrimoNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Alakayak v. British Columbia Packers, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. CarpenterAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. FranklinWashington Supreme Court · 2014

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API