State v. Glotz

James Brian Glotz appeals from a judgment convicting him of arson, contrary to sec. 943.02 (1) (a), Stats., and an order denying his postconviction motion. The issues are whether his confession should have been suppressed because he was not told he could be waived into adult court and whether his ten-year sentence is excessive. We conclude that the confession was properly admitted and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing. We therefore affirm.

The facts are undisputed. Saturday, January 1, 1983, at about 1:10 a.m., defendant was taken into custody for attempted…