Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Hoyt, Brumm & Link, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 17, 1994No. 2:93-cv-74344PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This race discrimination action is presently before the Court on the Motion of Defendant Hoyt, Brumm & Link, Inc. for summary judgment and dismissal of Plaintiffs Complaint in its entirety. Plaintiff has filed a Response to Defendant’s Motion, and on June 30, 1994, the Court heard oral argument on this matter.

Having reviewed and considered the parties’ respective briefs and supporting documents, and having heard the oral arguments of counsel at the hearing held on June 30, 1994, the Court is…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. BudcoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
  2. Perkins v. Regents of the University of MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
  3. Berlanga v. Terrier Transportation, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2003
  4. Thomas v. Autumn Woods Residential Health Care FacilityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995
  5. Terwilliger v. GMRI, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API