Legal Opinion

United States v. Poindexter

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 19, 1989No. Crim. 88-0080-01 (HHG)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge.

The issue before the Court is whether it should dismiss the indictment on account of what defendant claims to be the government’s failure to comply with the requirements of Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441, 92 S.Ct. 1653, 32 L.Ed.2d 212 (1972).

I

Factual Background

In the spring of 1987, defendant was subpoenaed to testify and to provide documents to the congressional committees investigating the so-called Iran-contra affair. Prior to that time, the Office of Independent Counsel had convened a grand jury which was investigating the same subject in a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. United States v. BlueSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. John M. PoindexterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  2. United States of America, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Jerry Lee Harvey, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. HarloffDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1992
  4. United States v. John M. PoindexterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API