Legal Opinion

BURNETT v. Hatch

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1954Published

1Opinion of the Court

200 Or. 291 (1954)

266 P.2d 414

BURNETT ET AL.

v.

HATCH

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued November 18, 1953.

Reversed and remanded January 27, 1954.

Bruce J. Manley, of Medford, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Hanley & Manley and Edward B. Hanley, Jr., of Medford.

Stanley C. Jones, Jr., of Medford, filed a brief for respondents.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

PERRY, J.

This is a suit brought by the plaintiffs to quiet their title in and to certain real property described as follows:

"Lots Twelve (12), Thirteen (13), Fourteen (14), Fifteen (15), and Sixteen (16), Block 7 of Central Point,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Sache v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. Wells Fargo & Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Weber v. RothchildOregon Supreme Court · 1887

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API