Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Anaconda Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 3, 1979No. 78-1637PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
The Secretary of Labor petitions to review and set aside an order of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission issued January 26, 1978. The Secretary issued citations in June 1977 against respondent Anaconda Company for violations of 29 C.F.R. § 1910.179, a safety standard governing overhead and gantry cranes, occurring at Anaconda's copper refinery at Great Falls, Montana. Respondent duly contested the citations and proposed penalty. The administrative law judge vacated the Secretary’s order, holding that the standard involved was merely advisory as to cranes…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- California Stevedore and Ballast Company v. Occupational Safety and Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc. v. Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Usery v. Kennecott Copper Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Edison Electric Institute v. Occupational Safety and Health AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Trident Seafoods Corporation, and Tom Stakkeland James HintonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Daniel Kim v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor v. Bechtel Power CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.