Legal Opinion

Figueroa v. City of Garden City

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 1988No. Docket 90745, 92126PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

These consolidated cases both involve plaintiffs who fell and suffered injuries on allegedly defective sidewalks in the City of Garden City. Plaintiffs filed actions against the city. At the time the actions were filed, the city had enacted Garden City Ordinance 94.37, which provided:

All sidewalks within the City shall be kept and maintained in good repair by the owner of the land adjacent to or abutting upon it. If an owner shall neglect to keep and maintain the sidewalk along the front, rear, or side of the land owned by him in good repair and safe for the use of the public, the owner shall…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Davis v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Levendoski v. GeisenhaverMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Woodworth v. BrennerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Gillen v. MartiniMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Carroll v. JobeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Bivens v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Carroll v. JobeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Judith Angeloff v. City of Royal OakMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API