Legal Opinion

Cadorette v. Markarian

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 2, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParsons, C. J.

The defendant’s contention that there was no evidence to sustain the verdict comes too late after the submission of the case to the jury without objection. Farnham v. Anderson, 74 N. H. 405. The defendant, however, lost nothing by failure to object to the submission of the case to the jury. The plaintiff testified the defendant showed him as part of the land he offered for sale a tract which he did not own and which was not included in the deed.

The defendant’s denial that he intended to sell this tract or showed it as part of the land he was selling did not wipe the plaintiff’s evidence out…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Farnham v. AndersonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1907
  2. Marshall v. MorinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bennett v. LaroseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  2. Wisutskie v. MalouinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  3. Emerson v. Universal Products Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API