Legal Opinion

Pettitt v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 12, 1923Published

1Opinion of the CourtClabK, C. J.

This appeal is from a nonsuit. Regardless of all statutory regulations, the mere fact of employment of the intestate, a boy less than 12 years of age and wearing knee breeches, the assignment of him to the hazardous task of crossing eighteen to twenty railroad tracks at all hours for the purpose of conveying telegraph and other messages to the numerous officials was a hazardous work, and the assignment of him to such a task constituted negligence on the part of the defendant. In addition, it is not shown that he was instructed or cautioned by the officials in charge as to the dangers incident…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Railroad Company v. FortSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Leathers v. Blackwell Durham Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Rolin v. . Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Pressly v. Yarn Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Greenlee v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API