Legal Opinion
911 Emergency Services, Inc. v. Sacramento Regional Fire/EMS Communications Center
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 23, 1995No. 95-15224Published
1Opinion of the Court
56 F.3d 72
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
911 EMERGENCY SERVICES, INC., dba American Medical Response
of Sacramento Valley, a California corporation,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SACRAMENTO REGIONAL FIRE/EMS COMMUNICATIONS CENTER, a local
public entity; Sacramento County Fire Protection District, a
local public entity; Courtland Fire Protection District, a
local public entity; Fair…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Miller v. California Pacific Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Mercy-Peninsula Ambulance, Inc. v. County of San MateoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Traweek v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990