Legal Opinion

Maricopa County v. Property Tax Oversight Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 27, 1997No. 1 CA-TX 95-0019PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARBARINO, Judge.

The Property Tax Oversight Commission (PTOC) appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of Maricopa County (the County). PTOC contends that sums paid by the County as property tax refunds for prior years fall within the County’s levy limit for the year of payment pursuant to Article 9, section 19 of the Arizona Constitution and Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (A.R.S.) sections 42-301 to 313 (1991 & Supp.1996). We find that the trial court properly granted summary judgment and affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 1990, this Court decided Hayden Partners…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kerby v. LuhrsArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Central Dauphin School District v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Lewis v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Wise v. First National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Town of Flagstaff v. GomezArizona Supreme Court · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Navajo County v. Property Tax Oversight CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API