Legal Opinion

Wright v. Wright

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 5, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

On February 21st, 1934, the Court of Probate for the district of Bristol limited six months from that date for the presentation of claims against the estate of Wilfred E. Fogg, deceased, the limitation expiring on August 21st, 1934. On October 20th, 1934, the administration account was approved, distribution was ordered and the administrator distributed the assets excepting a portion of the cash. On November 13th, 1934, Louise Bohme filed, under § 4914 of the General Statutes, a petition that the Court of Probate limit a further time within which she might present a claim against the estate…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cone v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  2. Roth v. RavichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  3. Holway v. AmesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
  4. Estabrook v. MoultonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Whitcomb v. Davenport's Est.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peyton v. WerhaneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  2. Richey v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  3. Gwynn v. TierneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. In Re ClyneConnecticut Superior Court · 1944
  5. Peyton v. WerhaneConnecticut Superior Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API