Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Board of Education
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.
The findings of fact by the referee and the trial judge establish substantially the following fact-status: When Clark, the contractor, defaulted, the hoard of education had in hand, applicable to the contract price, the sum of $3,067.50 plus the Murchison Bank item of $132.50, making a total of $3,200. If said board had complied with the contract with respect to the retained percentage, as it had agreed to do, it would have had in hand, applicable to the contract price, the sum of $4,375.20. When the default occurred it was the duty of the surety to complete the building. The surety, however,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Noland Co. v. . TrusteesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Warner v. . HalyburtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Mfg. Co. v. . BlaylockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Crouse v. . StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Hutchinson v. . CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hochevar v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933