Legal Opinion

Cerrillo v. Berryhill

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 3, 2019No. 3:18-cv-03863Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOHN P. CERRILLO, 10 Case No. 18-cv-03863-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER REMANDING FOR 12 PAYMENT OF BENEFITS ANDREW SAUL, 13 Defendant. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Plaintiff John Cerrillo appeals the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the 17 Commissioner”) denying him disability benefits under the Social Security Act (“SSA”). An 18 Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) reviewed Cerrillo’s application and determined he was not 19 disabled and thus not eligible for benefits. Upon consideration of the parties’…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Lingenfelter v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Carmickle v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Mary M. MAGALLANES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API