Legal Opinion · Concurrence

General Methods Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 25, 1970No. C.D. 4080Published

1Concurrence

CONCURRING Opinion

Newman, Judge:

I concur.

I agree with the views expressed by Judge Ford, but wish to add these observations:

The record establishes that the imported Meta capsule production machine is designed to manufacture “capsules” in various sizes made of thin aluminum foil. These capsules are cylindrical thimble-like objects, and are used as secondary closures for bottles containing wine or other spirituous liquor. The capsules fit over the top of the neck of the bottle and the primary closure (screw cap or cork), and serve to decorate the bottle. The imported machine only manufactures…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Georgia Pulp & Paper Manufacturing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. Pitney-Bowes, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Nissho Pacific Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. W. N. Proctor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API