Legal Opinion
Stevens v. Ohio
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio
Decided May 5, 1899No. 5,893PublishedCited by 2 opinions
On Application by Emil Stevens for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
1Opinion of the Court
RICKS, District Judge.
The following is the agreed statement of facts;, “In the matter of the indictment of said defendant in said court for unlaw fully selling intoxicating liquor as a beverage to one Richard Roe. in the township of Mt. Pleasant, a prohibition township, in the county of Jefferson, and state of Ohio, and without the limits, of a municipal corporation, on (he 17th day of December, 1898, counsel for the state, as well as the defendant and his counsel, admit and agree that the following statement shall constitute, and actually are, the material facts in this case: That said Emil…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re RahrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Rhodes v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Adams Exp. Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1902
- De Bary v. DunneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1909